Group 10 – Guppy Courtship, Light Environments, and Female Receptiveness

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

79 Responses to Group 10 – Guppy Courtship, Light Environments, and Female Receptiveness

  1. Likes Taisha says:

    This was a neat video. I enjoyed the simple drawings that were relevant to the narrator’s words. The camera was shaky at times, but all around this was a great video.

  2. Stawara Lilla says:

    Nice choice of presentation! The drawings were appropriate for the material being discussed. The only thing is that the angle of the camera wasn’t that great, because a lot of the time the drawings were covered up by the person who was drawing them. Also, the audio quality wasn’t uniform, so it was a little bit distracting. The information was very thorough and it was an overall good video.

  3. Jones Dillon says:

    The material was presented well, but narration was not always excellent volume. The camera angle and stability could have used a bit of work, but a quality video over all.

  4. Quintas Gabriel says:

    Video was engaging and clear to understand. Only improvement would be to put the camera in a better position so it’s clearer to see what is being drawn.

  5. Patel Parth says:

    The video was good and entertaining. The organization was good but I had a problem with the camera angles. It was shaky making it harder to concentrate on the content. Overall good job, this video reminded me of a lab report.

  6. Kumar Nishant says:

    Visuals were nice and colorful. Maybe you could have tried holding the camera directly above the head of the drawer. Information was solid though. Good job.

  7. Nagesha Anirudh says:

    This video is very informative. I had a problem with concentrating on the visuals because of the shaky camera. I’m sure other people have suggested this, but a camera angle directly above the paper probably would have fixed that problem. Speeding up the video was smart, but I think at times it was going a little to fast. Good job.

  8. Ortega Michelle says:

    What I really liked about this video was the way that it was presented. Using someone to color on paper that is already titled is a really smart idea and a way to keep the audience aware of what exactly is being discussed. The only thing I did not like about this style was that you could not really analyze the figures well; the camera was too far from the paper. The information was also presented very well, though. Good job!

  9. Phillips Matthew says:

    The video was very easy to follow with your group always showing us what step of the scientific process we were on throughout the video. i liked the visuals ,and I thought the video had a lot of good information that was explained very well. the only critique is that sometimes the editing of the video would run an image over the next part of the video for a few seconds. Overall, a job well done.

  10. Amoss John says:

    Script was informative and helpful. Audio and visuals seemed very rushed and sloppy. Information was thoroughly presented but it wasn’t very enjoyable.

  11. Sills Ann-Marie says:

    I like the approach- having the voice-over with corresponding visual aids. My only critique is that I’m not a huge fan of the side angle view, but this didn’t take away from the overall content. Good project!

  12. Cho Soo says:

    It’s interesting because light environment paired with female receptivity affects mating habits. I think it was informative, but the voice was too fast to listen to everything.

  13. Swope Jason says:

    Good job using the different visual style with the colored pencils to present the topic. Along with the good commentary on the topic it was very well explained. I enjoyed learning about this topic.

  14. Rajchel Milosz says:

    The information was definitely there – I don’t think you missed anything. The narration was monotone and could have been done better though. The camera angle needs improvement. Good job overall!

  15. smortley3 says:

    This video was overall very informative but the audio could have been better and more interesting to engage viewers.

  16. Brockman Christine says:

    Good job! I felt that the organization of the video and audio was great, and the information was presented in a way that was easy to understand. However, the audio was at times a bit difficult to clearly hear and understand.

  17. Garg Pallavi says:

    The results of the experiment were presented in an easy-to-follow way and explained thoroughly. The audio and camera angle took a little bit away from the overall video but it was effective nonetheless.

  18. Berlinghoff Adam says:

    A lot of people didn’t credit the authors of the original work so good job on that. The hand-made animations were cool, and the information was presented clearly and in a way that was easy to understand.

  19. Sewall Christian says:

    Despite the simplistic presentation, I was engaged the whole time. This approach to the video I think was a smart one, as it helped the video as a whole stand out from the rest.

  20. Ferguson David says:

    The video was good with visual descriptions. The audio could be improved, however the drawing and visuals were engaging

  21. Okudoh Victoria says:

    I think this visuals are the best I have seen so far. I like that the individual headings are on each of the scripts. It is very interesting.

  22. Diaz Noah says:

    The drawings were good but hard to see at times. I liked the information being presented though

  23. Chawla Rishab says:

    Perfect flow of ideas and explanations. Audio quality was slightly off and the drawings could have been enhanced more, but a job well done nonetheless!

  24. Perry Timothy says:

    Information flowed like water, but the presentation fell a little short due to audio and visuals. Still, great job.

  25. Mendoza Franco says:

    This project explains the topic very well but it becomes a little boring after a while

  26. Popovici David says:

    Drawings could be better. Overall good video.

  27. Bondarev Dmitry says:

    This video is well-organized and the content is very clear. However, some of the visuals could have been more detailed.

Comments are closed.